Nurse Writes

Follow Us
NURSE WRITERS
NURSE WRITERS

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2 Planning for Change in Clinical Practice

Samples Papers

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do
eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam

Universities

Assessment

Rn to Bsn

NHS FPX 4000:
Developing a Health Care Perspective
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000:
Developing a Health Care Perspective
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000:
Developing a Health Care Perspective
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000:
Developing a Health Care Perspective
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000:
Developing a Health Care Perspective
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000:
Developing a Health Care Perspective
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000:
Developing a Health Care Perspective
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills








NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2
[Student Name]
Capella University
[Prof. Name]
August 2025

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2: The Role of Nurse Informaticists in Healthcare

High-quality treatment of patients by healthcare providers is a precondition of patient safety, minimization of complications, and outcomes. The article leverages the interdisciplinary team work and evidence-based intervention to present systematic solutions to some of the issues that have been a curse to clinical environments with good clinical practice in an attempt to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTIs) in an acute care unit of a community hospital. This clinical evaluation relies on the problem which was detected in this plan. CAUTIs are on the rise and preventable etiology of nosocomial infections with high impact on the morbidity of patients, length of stay and healthcare expenditure.

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2 is aimed at the implementation of a standard CAUTI prevention bundle following the latest research and designed in accordance with the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model. It will be the basis of the intervention itself, strategies of its execution, the participation of stakeholders, the assessment process, and ethical perspectives.

Description of the Problem and Goal Setting

The figures presented by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm the fact that CAUTIs constitute approximately 30 per cent of all the acute infections that are contracted in healthcare facilities, and that is why it is one of the most common illnesses connected to healthcare. Rubi (2022) claimed that the prevention of urinary tract infections is a problem that should be taken seriously because it is one of the most avoidable illnesses and is often provoked by the vast number of catheters and negligence of sterile operations. They are largely associated with disloyal catheter care,


improper insertion ceremonies and overuse of implanted urinary catheters. This brings out the importance of planning for change clinical practice in order to enhance results and minimize risks. Internal rates of infection control documented in the acute care unit reveal that in the past six months, CAUTIs have been on the increase particularly among old patients and patients with long hospital stay. The trend indicates the need of an evidence-based intervention, which is to be taken into account and the lack of preventive measures.

The initial target of the whole project, based on NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2, is to ensure that CAUTI prevention bundle will ensure the reduction of CAUTI by at least 30 percent in 6 months. This bundle will be complemented in staff education by catheter need daily monitoring and practice improvement documentation. In this project, both behavioral and procedural intervention will enhance adherence to good clinical practices and establish a long-term culture of safety and responsibility in catheter care.

Evidence-Based Strategies

The focus of much of the research work on CAUTI prevention modalities is the means by which one can limit the quantity of undesired insertions, promote sterile insertion practices, and the promotion of proper withdrawal practices all of which support accepted clinical practice guidelines. As far as the pathologies of hospital-acquired infections are numerous and expensive, Monegro (2023) clarifies that the term CAUTI is one of the most common and expensive phenomena that should be minimized by concentrating on the implementation of infection control standards to decrease the number of patients with CAUTI. Before the urinary catheter, the bladder scanner has been employed to investigate the urinary retention avoiding catheterization.

Otherwise, physician reminders in the form of the use of electronic health records (EHRs) can help to raise the rate of documentation and remind the physicians that the catheter might require change. This literature recommends that it must be undertaken in a multimodal fashion which means that mass training of the staff, process control and technological support has to be involved.

Proposed Intervention Plan

The intervention plan, using the evidence, as it is presented in NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2, will be founded on CAUTI prevention bundle, which is centered on inserting catheters in an aseptic fashion, recording the need of catheter insertion, removal in a timely manner, and educating employees. Patel et al (2023) provided the most recent evidence-based CAUTI prevention practices in acute care hospitals and were all based on the aseptic insertion bundles, catheter avoidance bundles, maintenance bundles, and removal bundles. This plan must involve bladder scanner tests since it will reduce cases of unwarranted catheter insertions. Implementing change in healthcare involve training staff on the best practices on catheter care and remind them of the existing practice in the patient care environments with visual aids on the EHR templates that will be revised to contain both the areas that need catheter indication and reassessment.

This plan will be used on NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2 using the PDSA model. Planning will include personnel training, development of checklists and development of teaching materials. A two-week trial as a part of Do step will be presented in a unit. The phase will be the Study period, where the data on the rate of infections and compliance of the staff above will be gathered. The second stage will

entail refinement of the intervention according to the feedback and implications and will subsequently be offered to execution of the intervention on a hospital-wide level. The structure of this cycle enables the design to be loose and responsive to the real clinical operationalised phases. To make it a success, an intervention should engage the stakeholder. Participants who will be of the greatest interest are the nursing staff, doctors, infection prevention specialists, quality improvement specialists and nurse educators. All these organizations play a role in the initiation and sustenance of the program. The nursing staff is in the frontlines as far as catheter management is concerned and should be supported and trained in the same. Physicians should play significant roles in supporting the use of catheters when re-negotiating the decisions. Check trends would be reported by the prevention team and the leaders of the quality improvement would spearhead the overall strategy of implementation.

The communication channel will be realized by creating an open channel, which implies transparency, and the channel of motivating everyone. To bring it into alignment with good clinical practices, the weekly staff meetings and twice guided huddles would be utilized to report updates, grievances and progress. It would also introduce a monthly dashboard in the lounges of the staff and would include CAUTI rates and compliance rates. Wernburg (2022) condensed the most recent problems connected to the question of CAUTI control and their solution including the development of antibiotic resistance and novel catheter pattern. All the group members are welcome to take ownership and assume responsibility in this free flowing, collaborative style of communication.

NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2 suggests that an education should be the biggest component of any quality improvement program. The involved staff will undergo thorough training, and it should be theoretical as well as practical. The program will address the importance of CAUTI prevention, aseptic technique, catheter management and records of catheter indications. It will also educate the nurses to use the bladder scanners on them that will enable them know whether a patient is withholding his/her urine or not without rushing to catheterize a patient. Both asynchronous and synchronous education will be ensured with the help of new live sessions and online classes. The refresher training will be provided each month, both, in staff meetings, and in the case of onboarding new employees. The role-playing situations and the training will be followed and the demonstration will be provided. To promote and remind the practice and reduce any deviation, visual reminders and task aids will also be located in the patient care areas.

Evaluation and Measurement of Outcomes

The most important element of assessing the effectiveness of the intervention will be taken as a foundation of the further improvements. The evaluation plan would entail process and outcome measures that will play a crucial role in implementing change in healthcare. The measure of whether the intervention is effective is the measure of the impact of intervention. Both process and result measures are present in the evaluation plan. The decrease in the rates of CAUTIs per 1000 catheter days would present the main outcome measure. This data will be collected by the infection prevention team monthly and compared to continuous baselines after each six-month time.

Process measurements include the rate of bladder scanner utilization, compliance with paperwork and a timely removal of catheters. Pre-intervention and post-intervention questionnaire will be used to determine the attitude and degree of knowledge of the staff about catheter care. Spot audits to detect compliance with the aspects of the CAUTI bundle will also be made. 

As patient-reported outcomes are an essential part of a healthcare quality indicator, the assessment step would also entail a patient reporting his or her satisfaction with urine care. All the information will then be communicated to stakeholders to congratulate the good done and correct what has to be done. Schatz Bergren (2022) agreed with the use of team huddles in the healthcare industry as the most desirable medium of communication to realize the staff awareness, coordination, and patient safety results.

Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory Considerations

Because the nature of the project is to prevent possible harm and also improve patient outcomes in accordance with the clinical practice guidelines, it is closely associated with such ethical concepts as beneficence and nonmaleficence. Since the care methods used are standard, the intervention does not present the patients with any novel hazards. 

With that said, all the data will be de-identified so as to ensure the privacy of patients and adherence to HIPAA. The nature of the project will be informed to the employees and there will be a chance to be involved in training activities and questionnaires. Lin et al. (2022) state that multidisciplinary teams in hospitals have a positive influence on the quality of their work due to the huddles, enhancing the

dynamics of the team, responding to the existing issues in a timely manner, and patient outcomes and workflow. The regulatory standards that the project is responding to is the joint commission and CDC on prevention of infectious disease standards. Most of the medical facilities are using the set of Autism Spectrum Disorders prevention as recommended nationally. The given best practices signify that the facility is concerned about the external quality standard and the given practice assists the facility to address its internal performance concerns.

Addressing Barriers and Ensuring Sustainability

The process of change of clinical practice will always have its difficulties and other unexpected obstacles. The possible barriers to this program are that the workforce may be opposed to changes implemented, the busy units will have no time, and the extensive documentation may be incomprehensive. The project team will be interested in promoting the early-involvement, peer-to-peer-support and collaboration between the unit leaders to eradicate real world problems in developing the principles of good clinical practice

It is proposed to include the CAUTI prevention bundle into the institutional policy and to calculate the feasibility of the policy on the long-term level, by evaluating the staff performance. They will be used through unit champions in order to be observed and guided to work according to compliance. Weekly performance reviews will make the team performance-oriented and accountable. Also, refresher courses will be completed once a year as a reminder of the need to practice in order to maintain the required continuing education.

Conclusion

It is stated that the reduction of CAUTI prevalence in acute care facilities is both a clinical imperative and an unprecedented responsibility that, based on NURS FPX 4905 Assessment 2, is ethically acceptable. This quality improvement initiative, the influence of the latest practices among the professionals and stakeholders of the organization and the monitoring of the progress will provide the opportunity to implement an evidence-based set of prevention measures to help to provide safer patient care in the long-term perspective. The systematic application of the PDSA formula visit to an industry can provide constant enhancement and long-term success. A 30-percent reduction in CAUTI rate is a realistic target that is demanded in the nursing practice improvement. Our collaboration will be capable of enhancing compliance to good clinical practice, and achieve a safety, accountability and high care culture in management of urinary catheters.

 

References

Lin, S. P., Chang, C. W., Wu, C. Y., Chin, C. S., Lin, C. H., Shiu, S. I., Chen, Y. W., Yen, T. H., Chen, H. C., Lai, Y. H., Hou, S. C., Wu, M. J., & Chen, H. H. (2022). The effectiveness of multidisciplinary team huddles in a healthcare hospital-based setting. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15, 2241–2247. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S384554

Monegro, A. F., Muppidi, V., & Regunath, H. (2023). Hospital-acquired infections. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441857/

Patel, P. K., Advani, S. D., Kofman, A. D., Lo, E., Maragakis, L. L., Pegues, D. A., Pettis, A. M., Saint, S., Trautner, B., Yokoe, D. S., & Meddings, J. (2023). Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 update. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 44(8), 1209–1231. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.137

Rubi, H., Mudey, G., & Kunjalwar, R. (2022). Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Cureus, 14(10), e30385. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30385

Schatz, M., & Bergren, M. D. (2022). The huddle: A daily dose of communication. NASN School Nurse, 37(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X211056371

Werneburg, G. T. (2022). Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Current challenges and prospects. Research and Reports in Urology, 14, 109–133. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S273663

 



NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Applying Research Skills

Get in Touch:

contact@nursewrites.com

Call Us Via:

1 (820) 500-1035‬

Get in Touch:

nursewrite@gmail.com

Call Us Via:

+0 123 456 7890

Testimonials

At Nurse writes, students from Capella University trust our guides and sample assessments to make their learning easier. Read how our resources have helped nursing learners save time, improve grades, and feel more confident in their FlexPath journey.

Sarah M

Nursing Student

Nurse writes really helped me with my NURS-FPX assessment. The sample paper was well-written and matched Capella’s grading style. It made it much easier to understand how to organize my own work. Totally worth checking out!

Daniel R

BSN Learner

I used the Nurse writes sample for my NURS-FPX  assessment, and it was extremely helpful. The explanations were clear, and I got a better idea of what my instructor expected. My final submission improved a lot thanks to this resource.

Emily J

MSN Student

The MSN  sample assessment from Nurse writes was a huge help. It showed exactly how to structure each section and use proper nursing terminology. The quality of writing and formatting was excellent.

Take our Experts Help for a Free Trial!

Please enter your correct contact information

Verification is necessary to avoid bots

Take our Experts Help for a Free Trial!

Please enter your correct contact information

Verification is necessary to avoid bots